Protect Every Visit: A Proven Playbook to Test and Defeat Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Home Health

Ginny Kenyon • October 23, 2026

The rapid expansion of home health care—driven by an aging population and a preference for community-based care—has transformed modern healthcare delivery. However, this growth has also made the sector a primary target for improper payments, systemic inefficiencies, and malicious actors. 


Safeguarding federal healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid requires robust, proactive frameworks to test, detect, and combat fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA). 


1. Defining the Threat: Fraud vs. Waste vs. Abuse 


To effectively combat improper practices, home health agency (HHA) leadership, compliance officers, and auditors must clearly distinguish between the three components of FWA: 


  • Fraud: An intentional deception or misrepresentation made to obtain an unauthorized benefit. In home health, this includes billing for skilled nursing or aide visits that never occurred, ghost-writing patient charts, falsifying clinical signatures, or paying kickbacks for patient referrals. 


  • Waste: The overutilization of services or the misuse of resources resulting from inefficient processes, poor workflows, or operational carelessness rather than intentional dishonesty. Examples include redundant medical supplies, excessive therapy visits lacking clinical utility, or administrative bottlenecks. 


  • Abuse: Practices that directly or indirectly result in unnecessary costs but may not originate from knowing, deceptive intent. Common examples include unintentional upcoding, misusing specific procedure codes, or billing for services that do not meet nationally recognized standards of medical necessity. 


2. High-Risk Vulnerabilities in Home Health Care 


The unique decentralized nature of home care—where clinicians and aides operate independently in private residences—creates distinct operational risks: 


  • Unverified Visits and Timesheet Fraud: Because care is delivered out of sight, dishonest providers or workers can manipulate time logs, leading to discrepancies between billed hours and actual bedside care. 


  • Questionable Medical Necessity: Services must be tied directly to a physician-certified plan of care reflecting a patient's homebound status and active need for skilled care. Routine maintenance care billed as "skilled" represents a major audit trigger for the Office of Inspector General (OIG) and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). 


  • Kickbacks and Patient Brokering: Unlawful financial arrangements involving patient recruiters, physicians, or assisted living facilities can compromise objective clinical referrals, steering vulnerable patients to substandard or fraudulent agencies. 


3. Best Practices for Testing and Detection

 

Combating FWA requires continuous internal testing rather than waiting for external federal or state audits. Leading agencies utilize several key testing strategies: 


Data-Driven Analytics and Pre-Billing Audits 

Agencies should use management reports with automated algorithms to screen billing patterns before submitting claims. Alerts for sudden volume spikes, duplicate claims, unusual diagnosis codes, or outlier visit patterns can identify billing discrepancies early. 


Electronic Visit Verification (EVV) Cross-Checking 

EVV technology tracks the exact time, location, and type of home care services rendered via GPS and mobile stamps. Compliance teams should regularly audit EVV logs against submitted claims and payroll timesheets to detect gaps or falsified visits. 


Routine Claims and Documentation Reviews 

Conducting regular, random sampling of clinical charts ensures that documentation explicitly supports the medical necessity of every visit. Reviewers check whether face-to-face encounter notes from physicians are present, timely, and aligned with the plan of care.

 

4. Building a Comprehensive Compliance Framework 

Under guidance from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) and CMS, an effective compliance program must anchor itself around core foundational elements: 


1. Written Policies, Procedures, and Codes of Conduct: Clearly define acceptable behavioral and billing standards, articulating a zero-tolerance stance toward fraudulent behavior. Must be part of orientation and ongoing continuing education for all staff. 


2. Designated Leadership: Appoint a qualified Compliance Officer backed by a compliance committee with direct reporting lines to the governing board and operations. 


3. Mandatory Training and Education: Deliver comprehensive FWA and compliance training during onboarding and at least annually for all employees, contractors, and administrative staff. 


4. Confidential Reporting and Non-Retaliation: Maintain open-door policies, anonymous hotlines, and web portals allowing staff to report suspected wrongdoing without fear of professional backlash. 


5. Rigorous Credentialing and Exclusion Screening: Routinely screen all employees, vendors, and independent contractors against the OIG List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE) and SAM.gov databases to ensure barred individuals are not participating in federal programs. 


5. Response, Remediation, and Overpayment Protocols 


When internal testing or a whistleblower tips off an agency to potential non-compliance, swift action is legally and operationally mandatory: 


  • Immediate Investigation: Secure relevant electronic health records (EHR), billing records, and audit logs immediately to preserve evidence. 


  • Voluntary Self-Disclosure: If systematic overpayments or potential kickback issues are uncovered, evaluating participation in the OIG Self-Disclosure Protocol or CMS Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol can mitigate heavy penalties and reduce the risk of civil monetary fines or corporate integrity agreements. 


  • Corrective Action Plans (CAPs): Implement targeted retraining, policy revisions, or disciplinary measures to ensure the root cause is addressed and prevented from recurring. 


Conclusion 


Combating fraud, waste, and abuse in home health care is more than an administrative requirement; it is essential to patient safety and responsible financial stewardship. By using advanced verification technology, conducting routine internal testing, and fostering a strong culture of compliance, home health agencies can protect their integrity and ensure vulnerable patients receive honest, high-quality care. In early 2026, CMS temporarily halted enrollment of new Medicare agencies after data raised significant concerns about fraud, waste, and abuse in the Medicare home health and hospice sectors. Now more than ever, agencies MUST have systems in place to detect fraud, waste, and abuse.  If you are struggling with creating these systems, call Kenyon HomeCare Consulting at 206 721 5091 or email gkenyon@kenyonhcc.com. We are here to help. 


Results Based Consulting

Did you find value in this blog post? Imagine what we can do for your home care or hospice agency. Fill out the form below to see how we're leading the industry with innovation, affordability, and experience.

Contact Us

interim management
By Ginny Kenyon • October 22, 2026
In home health and hospice, you cannot simply press "pause" on operations while searching for a permanent executive or clinical director. Enter interim management.
6 steps to success
By Ginny Kenyon • October 16, 2026
A strong corporate culture is built intentionally through purposeful leadership, consistent behavior, and systems that align daily operations with core values.
Partnerships
By Ginny Kenyon • October 14, 2026
Converting a potential referral partner into a consistent source of business requires a structured, multi-touch relationship strategy not just a conversation
Corporate Culture
By Ginny Kenyon • October 8, 2026
Building and maintaining a strong, positive corporate culture is no longer a soft perk reserved for tech giants with ping-pong tables—it is a core business strategy.
recruitment and retention
By Ginny Kenyon • September 30, 2026
Winning the caregiver shortage isn't about running more ads; it's treating recruitment as a high-speed customer service experience and retention as a culture investment.
Regulatory compliance
By Ginny Kenyon • September 30, 2026
Regulatory compliance shouldn't function as a reactive response to survey threat; it must be embedded in day-to-day operations. Proactive agencies prove successful.
recruitment and retention
By Ginny Kenyon • September 26, 2026
By lowering turnover costs and unlocking capacity to accept referrals, home care agencies turn staff retention into their strongest revenue driver. It's a win-win.
true cost of claim denials
By Ginny Kenyon • September 23, 2026
Don’t leave money on the table. If you don't have OASIS-E1 and ICD-10 certified staff working in your agency, you are probably one of the agencies losing money.
retention crisis
By Ginny Kenyon • September 19, 2026
Investing in retention is tied to growth and clinical success. When agencies prioritize retention, they transform high-turnover roles into stable, lifelong careers.
Revenue leaks
By Ginny Kenyon • September 17, 2026
Is your Home Health agency making money but not as much as others in your area? Is your clinical and coding team making mistakes that leave money on the table?